Here's what I'm reading now: Daemon, by Daniel Suarez, a techno-thriller about an evil genius zillionaire games developer who dies and leaves behind a piece of intelligent viral software -- the titular daemon -- that infests the Internet and starts killing people in clever ways. It's up to our heroes, a good-natured cop and a clever IT guy, to stop it.

That's the premise. Suarez isn't much of a writer, in the sense that he's not especially gifted at putting words together. A blurb on the back compares him to Bruce Sterling (who I notice has a new book coming up) and Neal Stephenson, but that isn't quite right. Those guys are genuine artists with words: their books are seriously smart right down to the sentence level. Daemon is written clearly and economically, but otherwise not especially well.

However Suarez is an excellent plotter: something in his writerly metabolism cannot let a scene go by without a surprise or a twist or a clever bit or a set-piece. But what makes Daemon really interesting is that it's probably the most accurate novel about technology ever written.

Which sounds like faint praise, but listen. Suarez -- according to his bio -- is an "independent systems consultant" (just like his IT guy hero, Jon Ross). Which means that, as far as I can tell, he can actually describe the specific mechanics of, say, compromising a machine or a network in detail and with a level of sophistication I've never seen in print before. He doesn't make any of the classic movie tech fails, like having people type their passwords into a big box that you could see from across the room, then get back a big message that says ACCESS GRANTED. He gets the architecture and culture of MMO's just right. He understands the slippery pervasiveness of data, how easily it moves around and hides and seeps into everything. He gets how the world looks to a computer.

There's a great culture clash moment when one of our heroes shows a federal agent a government ID he's using to hide his identity. It shows the name "Littleton." The agent freaks out and accuses him of killing Littleton to get it. Our hero just laughs:

"Not Littleton's fault. He was eating lunch on a park bench. A digital camera with a zoom lens gave me a close-up image of his ID badge. I used a graphics program to paste in my own photo, then a portable card printer. All from the confines of my car."

Of course, the whole book is wildly implausible, but once you swallow the premise the rest of it is worked out with a rigorous attention to technical detail, using only present-day tech, and Suarez is endlessly clever at thinking of ways a genius-level AI could actually reach out and touch somebody through the Net. Daemon is a lot like a Crichton novel -- it's skeptical about the power we've given technology over us, but at the same time it can't stop fiddling with gadgets because they're so frickin' fascinating.

Daemon was originally self-published, and you can see why -- a book like this would have to come from a literary outsider. Even a systems consultant can't hack his way into the publishing world.

p.s. in unrelated news, Patrick McGoohan died. That's sad.

Comments (9)

Post a Comment »

  1. Call me crazy, but that sounds like a turnoff to me. While I am one of those IT folks, I don't necessarily need the ins and outs of every technological piece of a story to be true and accurate. I could bust out my product manuals for that. When technology moves the story, it's fine, but when you take a break for the author to show you just how IT-savvy he is, it's a yawn-fest. That's why I never made it through most of the early hard sci-fi or the spy novels - I simply find that it detracts from the story when they get too into the nuts and bolts of any subject. (Also, I'm a girl. Maybe that makes a difference?)

    masurix

    Jan. 14, 2009 18:24:pm

    at 18:24:pm

  2. Also, Riccardo "KHAAAAAAAAN" Montalban died, too.

    Church

    Jan. 14, 2009 18:47:pm

    at 18:47:pm

  3. KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN

    Lev Grossman

    Jan. 14, 2009 19:12:pm

    at 19:12:pm

  4. I don't know if I'd read the book, but it does bug me when Hollywood tries to use techno-babble ("Oh no, the hacker is downloading the hard drive! Quick, flush the BIOS and defrag the front-side bus! My god, what's he doing to that cache???").
    `
    It's fun to think about what James Bond would be now if McGoohan had taken the part. But alas, he's no longer a number. He's a free man.

    Dave

    Jan. 14, 2009 22:50:pm

    at 22:50:pm

  5. Dang I loved this post! True, I'm a geek.
    bloggit

    alexandriacarpetone

    Jan. 15, 2009 13:52:pm

    at 13:52:pm

  6. masurix - I agree with you, and I'm a dude. A dude that takes a nap when people start talking about iPhones.

    Cliff

    Jan. 15, 2009 18:37:pm

    at 18:37:pm

  7. I've read the book and loved it! FWIW, it's nothing like the technobabble that you see in most scifi books and shows. To me, this book reads more like an action-detective-mystery thriller with a techno edge that raises a lot of moral questions. Yes, technology is defined in the book but doesn't dwell on it....but what is really eery is that most of the technical details ( if not all) are based on existing technology. My wife hates sci-fi and technically oriented books but just could't seem to put this book down. She wouldn't read it when I suggested it (and actually rolled her eyes) but after a friend of hers read it she picked it up and was pleasantly surprised. I hope the movie people don't wreck the story.

    johnny6n4

    Jan. 25, 2009 10:55:am

    at 10:55:am

  8. Lev, thanks for the recommendation; I'll be checking Daemon out. From the description you gave, you may also enjoy David Lous Edelman's "Infoquake." The writing itself is average, but Edelman puts his business / web developer background to great use in constructing a far-future world's plot (and economic system) that's much more believably immersive than a lot of the hand-waving typically seen in the genre.

    An unrelated, minor dissent: I agree that Bruce Sterling can write beautifully, but I vastly prefer his non-fiction to his novels. Maybe the two or three Sterling novels I read were bad examples, but his plot and especially his characters were so variously silly, wooden, or contrived that I found myself repeatedly asking "are you serious?" Just my $0.02.

    And Neal Stephenson is a god! :)

    cjalexander

    Jan. 27, 2009 14:01:pm

    at 14:01:pm

  9. That's David Louis Edelman, sorry.

    cjalexander

    Jan. 27, 2009 14:02:pm

    at 14:02:pm