<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Said I Wouldn&#039;t Twitter, Then I Twittered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techland.com/2009/04/22/i-said-i-wouldnt-twitter-then-i-twittered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techland.com/2009/04/22/i-said-i-wouldnt-twitter-then-i-twittered/</link>
	<description>Tech, Games, Comics, Movies. We Promise Not to Tell.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:03:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lostepic</title>
		<link>http://techland.com/2009/04/22/i-said-i-wouldnt-twitter-then-i-twittered/comment-page-1/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>lostepic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1438#comment-858</guid>
		<description>I cut you slack lev.  With as much media that is out there, then to filter it to the only great ones, and work, and friends, and doing things other than sitting in front of a TV, no one can expect you to watch everything or get so hooked that you cant miss an episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cut you slack lev.  With as much media that is out there, then to filter it to the only great ones, and work, and friends, and doing things other than sitting in front of a TV, no one can expect you to watch everything or get so hooked that you cant miss an episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church</title>
		<link>http://techland.com/2009/04/22/i-said-i-wouldnt-twitter-then-i-twittered/comment-page-1/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1438#comment-834</guid>
		<description>@lostepic: At least you&#039;re trying. Lev doesn&#039;t seem to be quite as motivated...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@lostepic: At least you're trying. Lev doesn't seem to be quite as motivated...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lostepic</title>
		<link>http://techland.com/2009/04/22/i-said-i-wouldnt-twitter-then-i-twittered/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>lostepic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1438#comment-833</guid>
		<description>@Church:  a dig at Lev&#039;s lack of BSG knowledge?  thats lame.  I for one have not be able to watch the last season.  Saw the priemre and thats it.  Due to work, crappy internet connection that makes it impossible to get streaming video and no labtop to go to a cafe and watch it on wifi, I too am behind on the show.  I watch it soon enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Church:  a dig at Lev's lack of BSG knowledge?  thats lame.  I for one have not be able to watch the last season.  Saw the priemre and thats it.  Due to work, crappy internet connection that makes it impossible to get streaming video and no labtop to go to a cafe and watch it on wifi, I too am behind on the show.  I watch it soon enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church</title>
		<link>http://techland.com/2009/04/22/i-said-i-wouldnt-twitter-then-i-twittered/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1438#comment-832</guid>
		<description>@lostepic: Like blogging, Twitter is about as useful as the people you follow. I keep track of a couple musicians I really like (e.g., @mariancall), some people from an fiction podcast I am occasionally involved with, the principals at an forum that I moderate, a loose group of people who track certain cultural trends, and my GF. So, from my perspective, it&#039;s like I forced all the people to do a group blog that I can check in on regularly. 
.
My &#039;recommendations&#039; above were just a dig at Lev&#039;s shameful lack of BSG knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@lostepic: Like blogging, Twitter is about as useful as the people you follow. I keep track of a couple musicians I really like (e.g., @mariancall), some people from an fiction podcast I am occasionally involved with, the principals at an forum that I moderate, a loose group of people who track certain cultural trends, and my GF. So, from my perspective, it's like I forced all the people to do a group blog that I can check in on regularly.<br />
.<br />
My 'recommendations' above were just a dig at Lev's shameful lack of BSG knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lostepic</title>
		<link>http://techland.com/2009/04/22/i-said-i-wouldnt-twitter-then-i-twittered/comment-page-1/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>lostepic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1438#comment-829</guid>
		<description>I am not hostile towards twitter myself; I in fact just started twitter, but I just don&#039;t care if Aston Kutcher just got out of a tight party with so and so.  The horrors of celebrity worship and common man narcissism is what irks me.  But as what has just been said, no one checks out those things, but my question is please give me your definition of what the purpose of twitter is?  @church due to the recommendations of who to follow is it more entertainment value than amassing information?

State of Play (the British miniseries not the Hollywood Afflack remake) explores the heart of journalism and the true merits of hardcore, tedious, traditional journalism verses the blogsphere.  While such said discussions are more prevalent in the Crowe/Afflack remake, Netflix the British miniseries.  Better acting, better script, better pace (over a approx. 6hr period.) etc...  I liked the new one but sometimes there are the exceptions but the original is the better of the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not hostile towards twitter myself; I in fact just started twitter, but I just don't care if Aston Kutcher just got out of a tight party with so and so.  The horrors of celebrity worship and common man narcissism is what irks me.  But as what has just been said, no one checks out those things, but my question is please give me your definition of what the purpose of twitter is?  @church due to the recommendations of who to follow is it more entertainment value than amassing information?</p>
<p>State of Play (the British miniseries not the Hollywood Afflack remake) explores the heart of journalism and the true merits of hardcore, tedious, traditional journalism verses the blogsphere.  While such said discussions are more prevalent in the Crowe/Afflack remake, Netflix the British miniseries.  Better acting, better script, better pace (over a approx. 6hr period.) etc...  I liked the new one but sometimes there are the exceptions but the original is the better of the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church</title>
		<link>http://techland.com/2009/04/22/i-said-i-wouldnt-twitter-then-i-twittered/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1438#comment-828</guid>
		<description>@Dave, but the misinformation was, for the most part, the result of the same old &#039;journalism.&#039; If anything, a faster cycle gives &#039;journalists&#039; less time for &#039;journalism.&#039; 
.
We&#039;ll have to come up with a word for this new breed that &#039;reports&#039; on events. Wait, it&#039;s on the tip of my tongue...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave, but the misinformation was, for the most part, the result of the same old 'journalism.' If anything, a faster cycle gives 'journalists' less time for 'journalism.'<br />
.<br />
We'll have to come up with a word for this new breed that 'reports' on events. Wait, it's on the tip of my tongue...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://techland.com/2009/04/22/i-said-i-wouldnt-twitter-then-i-twittered/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1438#comment-827</guid>
		<description>I read some interesting things (I think out of a CNN article) about the instant reporting about Columbine.  For the first time in a major news story, there were eye witnesses giving reports via cell phone as events were happening or immediately afterward.  The result was poor reporting and a LOT of misinformation that&#039;s accepted as the historical record of events.
`
Not that I&#039;m saying that having more people reporting quicker is a bad thing, but in our must-have-details-now era, it puts the responsibility of journalistic integrity even more so on reporters and editors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read some interesting things (I think out of a CNN article) about the instant reporting about Columbine.  For the first time in a major news story, there were eye witnesses giving reports via cell phone as events were happening or immediately afterward.  The result was poor reporting and a LOT of misinformation that's accepted as the historical record of events.<br />
`<br />
Not that I'm saying that having more people reporting quicker is a bad thing, but in our must-have-details-now era, it puts the responsibility of journalistic integrity even more so on reporters and editors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rorschach</title>
		<link>http://techland.com/2009/04/22/i-said-i-wouldnt-twitter-then-i-twittered/comment-page-1/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Rorschach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1438#comment-826</guid>
		<description>People that actually twitter about every minute detail do not get followed.  Really, any more than 5 in a day and it has to be something pretty interesting or it&#039;s just taking up space.  A common misconception is that people really post &quot;I&#039;m eating a PB&amp;J sandwich.&quot;  Sure, a few people do that, but no one is reading it.  It&#039;s not really the point.
.
But Maureen Dowd summed up the opposite of twitter better than I ever could.  She loses 2 cool points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People that actually twitter about every minute detail do not get followed.  Really, any more than 5 in a day and it has to be something pretty interesting or it's just taking up space.  A common misconception is that people really post "I'm eating a PB&amp;J sandwich."  Sure, a few people do that, but no one is reading it.  It's not really the point.<br />
.<br />
But Maureen Dowd summed up the opposite of twitter better than I ever could.  She loses 2 cool points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church</title>
		<link>http://techland.com/2009/04/22/i-said-i-wouldnt-twitter-then-i-twittered/comment-page-1/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1438#comment-824</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get why people have this weird aversion to Twitter. People *blogging* about how they don&#039;t like Twitter will get two hits from my Iron Mallet of Irony.
.
Suggested people for Lev to follow: @ronaldmoore  @gaiusbaltar @Tom_Zarek @ centurion0110</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't get why people have this weird aversion to Twitter. People *blogging* about how they don't like Twitter will get two hits from my Iron Mallet of Irony.<br />
.<br />
Suggested people for Lev to follow: @ronaldmoore  @gaiusbaltar @Tom_Zarek @ centurion0110</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lostepic</title>
		<link>http://techland.com/2009/04/22/i-said-i-wouldnt-twitter-then-i-twittered/comment-page-1/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>lostepic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1438#comment-823</guid>
		<description>true.  Mumbai is another example of twitter being useful, however, the sense that the populous is becoming so narsassitic to document every minute detail and plaster it to the world.  Mumabi and the Hudson plane crash are the exceptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>true.  Mumbai is another example of twitter being useful, however, the sense that the populous is becoming so narsassitic to document every minute detail and plaster it to the world.  Mumabi and the Hudson plane crash are the exceptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
