• Share

Worldcon is the World Science Fiction Convention. It happens every year. It has happened 67 times so far. This year it happened in a convention center in downtown Montreal.

It's a big event -- 4,000 people or so. Not Comic-con big, but big. The convention center itself was huge, I must have walked its length and breadth like 30 times. My calves are looking hot. They are defined.

This was my first Worldcon, but in spite of being a relative outsider I have collected my thoughts and impressions here. Because when has ignorance or inexperience stopped any journalist, ever?

1. It's pretty overwhelming when you first walk in. At any con you always have a few people who you know you're going to see, but you -- or at any rate I -- also have the impression that every single other person there knows every single other person, and you're the only one who's wandering around friendlessly. That impression fades after a while. As at every con I've been to, the people are extraordinarily nice and welcoming.

Still, the socializing can be intense. You have to physically leave the convention center for it to stop. If you have any kind of social anxiety at all, you have to take regular breaks or face a saving throw vs. madness.

2. I'm always surprised at how heterogenous fandom is. There were probably four generations of fans there. There was a guy -- his name is David Kyle -- who was at the first Worldcon in 1936. There are teenage Harry Potter fanatics. Old masters like Robert Silverberg were there. Middle-aged masters like Neil Gaiman were there. Young turks like Catherynne Valente and Patrick Rothfuss were there. I was there. There were costume people, writer people, editor people, artist people, etc. etc. Sociologically speaking fandom seems fractally diverse to me.

Example: I was on a Steampunk panel with, among others, a really nice and clever fellow named Milt Stevens. Milt Stevens is a past Worldcon chair. He's a retired crime analyst for the LAPD. I'm a snot-nosed ex-comp-lit-grad student. Even with all possible good will on both sides, it was harder than I expected to find a common critical dialect for talking about SF that was mutually intelligible. Same subculture, different worlds.

3. That Steampunk panel. I was surprised at how few overtly steampunk people were in the audience. At Comic-Con the line for the steampunk meet-up was a quarter-mile long. At Worldcon only two people showed up in costume.

I argued that the surging interest in steampunk is a reaction to the state of consumer technology. Essentially the tech around us, even while it's getting hellaciously sophisticated, is being taken away from us. It's becoming glossy and smooth. It's miniaturized and wireless to the point of near-invisibility. It's mass-produced, and you don't know where it comes from or what it's made out of, and you're not supposed to know. The case is sealed. The code is closed.

Steampunk inverts all of that. It makes technology visible again. You can see the gears and the tubes. You can see the grain in the wood and grease on the gears. It's not glossy and alien and mass-produced. It's bespoke and imperfect. You can make it, and if you don't like what you made, you can hack it.

After that I called for an end to the tyranny of electricity and burned my iPod, Hendrix-style.

4. The after-hours room party scene was kind of epic. Two floors of the con hotel were designated party floors, and various organizations sponsored parties in the various suites, on said floors, and people wandered from one to the next. The atmosphere was hot and sweaty and tropical. The elevators immediately clogged, and entry to the floors was tightly regulated to avoid some kind of F/SF Triangle Shirtwaist disaster. Rock Band was played. I drank some kind of vodka-infused slushy and talked to George R R Martin. Cool.

5. There is a loose and permeable but nevertheless real fan/pro division at these cons, and the pros, while also fraternizing with fans, tend also to frequent a bar designated for all-pro fraternizing. In this case it was a bar that served absinthe. I think you could describe the scene as jolly.

It was there, in the early morning hours, that I drunkenly accosted a very patient Larry Niven, who unlike me was wisely collecting two glasses of ice water at the bar. My sole aim was to confess to him that I'd swiped something from his work. There is a plot device in The Magicians about people tattooing pentagrams on themselves and trapping demons in there, to be released in case of emergency. This is an homage (i.e. a straight steal) from a great Niven story called “Not Long Before the End.”

Anyway, he was very nice about it -- about both the accosting and the stealing. God knows he's probably used to being stolen from. Cough, Halo, cough.

6. The Hugos are held at Worldcon. The warm and generous Lou Anders -- who's an editor at Pyr Books -- whom I'd never met before this convention, kindly smuggled me into the pre-Hugos reception, where nominees and their hangers-on (Lou was up for a Hugo for editor, long form) had a few drinks before shuffling into a large auditorium for an Oscars-type ceremony.

You can read the results for yourselves. Dr. Horrible won for short dramatic presentation, WALL-E for long. The Hugo for short story went to Ted Chiang. The Hugo for novel went to Neil Gaiman's The Graveyard Book.

(Gaiman was also the Guest of Honor this year. He was an elusive, ethereal presence throughout the con, constantly being rushed from talk to talk. I watched him charmingly introduce a screening of Coraline, after which I, and everybody else, watched the Blu-Ray drive crash four times in succession before I gave up.)

At the after-party -- into which the invincible Lou also insinuated me -- a shy, gracious Neal Stephenson debated the fine points of the Anathem cosmology with awestruck fans. (I think Anathem came second in the Hugo voting.) My record of making an ass of myself in front of my literary heroes went pretty much unblemished. I scored Bill Willingham as well. If I'd been able to track down Joe Haldeman, my triumph would have been complete.

Comments (14)

Post a Comment »

  1. So happy that Chiang won. He's my favorite current writer (no offense) and any story about sentient mechanical beings... well, you know where I'm going with this.

    I wonder if Stephenson would have won if it was known what his acceptance speech was going to be.

    The halos in Halo are an improvement on Niven's Ringworld. They can be structurally sound, and don't require another layer to simulate night. The Alien franchise actually provided most of the fodder for Bungie's game. (With a mere nod towards their own Marathon. Bastards.)

    Church

    Aug. 11, 2009 13:27:pm

    at 13:27:pm

  2. Neil Gaiman, Neal Stephenson, Joe Haldeman, Bill Willingham, etc. all in the same room? Sounds like nerd heaven to me.

    @ Lev - My local Borders had The Magicians as their big new release right in front of the door so you must be bribing the right people.

    No one is going to believe this, but I swear it's true. Five feet away from the table with Lev's books was another prominent display of a Battlestar Galactica board game. Apparently the Borders manager missed the memo about keeping at least a 50 foot separation between all BSG and Lev Grossman product.....

    Kemper

    Aug. 11, 2009 15:24:pm

    at 15:24:pm

  3. @ Kemper... It's a conspiracy, as at my Barnes & Noble, Lev's book was within an arm's distance to what was, I'm sure, the same board game.

    ... and I swore I would never get into the BSG taunting. ::sigh::

    hannef123

    Aug. 11, 2009 15:59:pm

    at 15:59:pm

  4. Hey, Lev. It was great to do a reading with you--even if we did have to shout for the lurkers in the back. Definitely some fun panels and good and famous people at Worldcon. Finished The Magicians last night and love it!

    chrish0ward

    Aug. 11, 2009 19:04:pm

    at 19:04:pm

  5. Yeah, Ted Chiang's work is... well-crafted.

    ...descriptionfail.

    In other news, Asians represent! :D

    sojournerstrange

    Aug. 12, 2009 11:55:am

    at 11:55:am

  6. Thanks Chris! Next year we should skip the small venues and just do an arena tour together.

    Lev Grossman

    Aug. 12, 2009 13:07:pm

    at 13:07:pm

  7. It was my first Worldcon as well, and enjoyed myself immensely.

    I was at your Steampunk panel and have to disagree with you. I don't really see Steampunk as a reaction to today's "no user serviceable parts inside" culture. The truth is that those devices are still modifiable and hackable, just usually via code rather than physical means. Witness the jailbroken iPhone, Boxee on the Apple TV, or the various disturbing things people have done with Roombas.

    I tend to view Steampunk more as an effort of the modern technological world to impose its norms on to an idealized Victorian age. And by norms, I obviously mean giant mechanical spiders.

    fordan42

    Aug. 12, 2009 13:49:pm

    at 13:49:pm

  8. Nice post, Lev. Good to hang with you out there in Montreal. Will post jolly absinthe photos soon. What are friends for? :)

    johnpicacio

    Aug. 12, 2009 23:30:pm

    at 23:30:pm

  9. "There was a guy -- his name is David Kyle -- who was at the first Worldcon in 1936"

    The first Worldcon was in NYC (Queens, to be more precise), in 1939, Nycon I. (See here: http://www.nesfa.org/data/LL/TheLongList.html)

    What you've obviously confused is Dave talking about being at what many allege to be the first sf convention, a which Wikipedia correctly notes (I was an expert fanhistorian back in the Seventies, creating the first regular Worldcon displays on fanhistory in 1977 and later, if you believe me about believing me -- or you could ask Milt Stevens), is actually a matter of some dispute, particularly between some American fanhistorians, a number of whom favor the impromptu Philadelphia gathering of 1936, and some British fanhistorians, who favor a formally organized convention in 1937, to really get into the weeds: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_fiction_convention#History_of_science_fiction_conventions

    But Dave was at that gathering in 1936, yes. (Personally, even though American, I'm in the group that agrees that the British have a considerably better claim for their 1937 convention, as the first real "convention," rather than a party, but there's never been unanimous agreement about definitions here, not that I imagine you care.)

    "It's a big event -- 4,000 people or so."

    It's variable, depending on location; it's been as large as 8000+ at the 1984 Los Angles convention, and nearly 7,000 at Boston in 1989, but, no, it doesn't come anywhere near San Diego Comic Con numbers, and that's very much the intention of almost all Worldcon runners, who typically seek to create a very different, far more community-driven, and more text-oriented, event.

    "I'm always surprised at how heterogenous fandom is."

    That's absolutely spot-on, and has always been the case, right from the beginning, when fans included doctors and machine-shop workers, lawyers, and film projectionists, well-off people, and the poverty-stricken. (Although fandom certainly was overwhelmingly white and male to begin with, and still trends disproportionately so, which has provoked much discussion in the last couple of decades, and even more in the last couple of years, sometimes with more heat than light.)

    Re Steampunk: "At Worldcon only two people showed up in costume."

    Worldcon has always been a lot less costume-heavy than press reports, which focus on the pictorial and sensational (as usual), or simple imagination, or experience with more media-focused conventions, might leave you a false impression of. There are a certain number of costumers, but the percentage of people who wear them around the con is in typically well under five percent or so. (My impression is that the press reports of SDCC tend to over-focus on the costumed, percentage wise, as well, granting that SDCC has a distinctly higher percentage of costumed folk than a Worldcon does.)

    "...and the pros, while also fraternizing with fans, tend also to frequent a bar designated for all-pro fraternizing. "

    I wasn't there, but I have to imagine that you're referring to the SFWA suite/venue, which has had somewhat different policies in different years, but which is more or less limited to either members and guests, or members and program participants, or some variant thereof; there's no actual way to card people for "professionalism" in general in the field, or even strictly define who would and wouldn't count, and neither would an actual commercial bar for some peculiar reason try.

    Good report, overall. Glad you had a good time.

    garyfarber

    Aug. 13, 2009 21:39:pm

    at 21:39:pm

  10. [...] Grossman’s Anticipation report for the Time magazine blog, besides being funny as hell, mentions my good friend from LASFS, Milt [...]

    File 770 » Blog Archive » Anticipation Stuff

    Aug. 16, 2009 02:55:am

    at 02:55:am

  11. Great con report, Lev. Even if the rest of it weren't good, you'd have earned a place in heaven for using a major media platform to inform the world that most Worldcon attendees DON'T wear costumes.

    Gary, your credentials as a fanhistorian are well known, so I can't believe you said, "The first Worldcon was in NYC (Queens, to be more precise), in 1939, Nycon I."

    The first worldcon was held in Manhattan, at Caravan Hall on East 59th Street. You were probably thinking of the fact that it was the presence of the 1939 World's Fair out in Queens that led to the con being called a "World Convention."

    Still, I'm glad you mentioned NyCon 1, since it provides the perfect segue to a mention of Time Magazine's notorious coverage of that event, which gave the fannish lexicon that wonderful phrase of mocking enthusiasm, first spotted in the pages of Time, "Gosh! Wow! Boyoh-boy!"

    Those who'd like to read the complete coverage can find the original article here: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,761661,00.html

    Lev, your excellent report is helping Time finally atone for its 70-year-old sins!

    moshefeder

    Aug. 22, 2009 12:56:pm

    at 12:56:pm

  12. I'm forgetful in my old age, Moshe. I was thinking of the Queens chapter of the Science Fiction League, and this, as well as World's Fair inspiring the name of the con, etc.

    garyfarber

    Aug. 22, 2009 13:09:pm

    at 13:09:pm

  13. Welcome, Lev, to the original geek squad.

    Lev wrote:
    ...and the pros, while also fraternizing with fans, tend also to frequent a bar designated for all-pro fraternizing. "

    Gary wrote:
    I wasn't there, but I have to imagine that you're referring to the SFWA suite/venue, which has had somewhat different policies in different years, but which is more or less limited to either members and guests, or members and program participants, or some variant thereof; there's no actual way to card people for "professionalism" in general in the field, or even strictly define who would and wouldn't count, and neither would an actual commercial bar for some peculiar reason try.

    I think Lev was talking about the Intercontinental Bar, a pricey bar with excellent tapas, a poor draft beer selection and absinthe, which I'd never seen sold in a bar before. It had a semi-private side room which a few pros took over. Some fans were in there too. It was also open pretty late, which made it the place to go if you were staying in a hotel near the convention center.

    The SFWA suite wound up having to move from one floor of the Delta to another when the hotel decided to close all open parties not on 28 or 5.

    lauriemann

    Aug. 22, 2009 14:15:pm

    at 14:15:pm

  14. Laurie, Cheryl Morgan also mentioned the Intercontinental here, and explained in a comment that:

    There was no bar to entry, save that there was no con suite and no free food/drink at parties in the Intercontinental. Lots of fans spent time there. Heck, we held a BASFA meeting there (which Mary Robinette Kowal and Connie Willis attended).

    This happens a lot at Worldcon in recent years. The pros look for a hotel near the convention that has a good bar and settle in there. Fandom heads for wherever the free food & drink can be found. But there is plenty of movement between the two.

    So obviously I misinterpreted Lev's referring to "a bar designated for all-pro fraternizing" as meant as literally "designated" as the actual designation of actual party floors per hotel contract with the convention, whereas the bar wasn't legally so contracted at all (as also the SFWA suite sometimes is).

    garyfarber

    Aug. 22, 2009 15:05:pm

    at 15:05:pm