The First Airbender: Shyamalan Talks Trilogies, Operatic Action and the Casting Controversy

It's finally opening day for The Last Airbender, the epic Avatar adaptation that arrives under a gloom of mean-spirited and short-sighted reviews, many outraged about the racial issues surrounding its casting. More on that a bit later with my review.

A couple of days ago, in the lead-up to the chaos, we were able to snag M. Night Shyamalan via cell. (Also: Check out our new Inception review)

I wanted to ask him a couple questions about the astonishing look and tempo of this movie. Relying on long takes, naturalistic battle sequences and some of the closest close-ups you've ever seen, it's a defiantly anti-Bourne adventure. It wants to pause and breathe and marvel – and I kind of dig that. Our quick Q&A:

At what point in the process do you decide that you were going to allow the film to breathe like this? There are sequences of such silent splendor, and some of those long takes are actually kind of hypnotic…I look at something like “Clash of the Titans” and this is just a 180-degree turn.

I just don't believe in making movies in the editing room. That's not cinema. You have to set out to create something very, very designed. When you think of the classic movies of all-time, the Hitchcock movies or The Godfather, they're all so designed with an intention of seeing the world with a certain point of view. The editing room's to fix our mistakes, not to create. So instead I go and hunt for a specific sort of energy, and color, and I try to create these moments. And I have no buyer's remorse whatsoever, I decide and move forward and feel totally at peace. (More from CNN's Geek Out beat: The Last Airbender fan reactions)

You talk about energetic moments, you really hold of some these crescendos a whole lot longer than I think many filmmakers would have even attempted. There are big, big moments here, when things happen they sort of explode.

Well I think you saw a little bit of it in Unbreakable, the poetry…action as more opera. Thinking on that scale, of creating the proscenium. And when we did the score for Airbender, we were watching the film without any dialogue, and you had these powerful images mixing with the music, and that's your dream version really - if you could just turn off the dialogue. But James Newton Howard's score is my favorite score that he's ever done – it's the the best we've ever done together. When we approach scoring, we do it very differently; he writes themes based on the script, and writes a suite of music, and then we pull the score from there and match it to the movie. The 14-minute original suite is what's going to be on the CD. (More at Techland: Twilight's Edward Cullen - Worst Movie Character Ever?)

This book – Book 1, as the movie says in the beginning - ends on a note that clearly points to more movies, and I've read that this is aiming to be a trilogy, right? Are you already committed for parts two and three?

Emotionally committed, absolutely, but that's definitely on them. The whole point for me was to make a long-form story. Not to have those repetitive chapters, where the characters all start again on a new adventure, I wanted to see the complete picture. And so the story ahead, there are much more issues in the second chapter, and we're all going to a large-scale evening the 3rd and final moment. I'm a big fan of the origins stories, that's my thing and so I wrote a first draft of the second movie in hopes that we get to make one. It's darker, a whole lot goes wrong, and I like the idea of getting darker with each movie, that as the kids get older, the story gets older. But we'll see.

And of course I have to ask about the racial controversy – that you didn't cast Asians in the lead children's roles. I couldn't help but notice that the rest of the cast is quite racially diverse – was it just that you needed the best kids that walked into those auditions on those days?

The whole scandal is ridiculous and it's ironic and it saddens me. At the same time I get it, people are sensitive, but it's an incredible small but vocal group that is upset here. And I don't want to dismiss them but I am the poster child for diversity and this is the most culturally diverse tent pole movie trilogy ever. It's staggering in its diversity, and I'm not bragging, it's just the way I see the world. I don't think there's an ‘appropriate Asian' or ‘inappropriate.' Anime is based on an art form where facial form is ambiguous; I see the whole world.

More at Techland: Ranking Pixar's Greatest Movies

Comments (16)

Post a Comment »

  1. I had very mixed feelings about the movie after watching it last night when it premiered. I loved how true Shyamalan was to both the story and the martial arts behind each of the bending styles, as well as how beautiful the movie was overall. Yet, I felt like the audience never got the chance to connect to any other characters other than Aang. That really took away from stories of Sokka, Katara, and Zuko for me. It also seemed like the writing was a little off at point, where characters seemed to voice obvious answers, which wasn't really a major problem, just somewhat of a distraction. Though, overall, being an Avatar fan, I genuinely enjoyed the movie and am excited for the release of the next installment.

    adreas0

    Jul. 1, 2010 13:22pm

  2. Eddie Murphy overtly told people to avoid "Pluto Nash". Aside from that, when's the last time you ever heard of anyone involved in a movie bad-mouthing it? This guy's livelihood is on the line. Of COURSE he'd going to say it's a wonderful film that turned out exactly as it should have, and everyone should go see it.

    Well, I DID go see it, and everybody else should stay away from it.

    richardsrussell

    Jul. 1, 2010 17:59pm

  3. Great that he throws it back at his critics for not casting asians in the lead role and try to use the fact that he himself is asian to try to negate the criticism. He should just admit that he had to cave to hollywood norms - there's no other excuse given that out of billions of asians in the world there must be plenty who are great actors that would have been great for the roles. In retrospect, it's better that he didn't cast asians in this crappy movie - they would have been blamed for its failure at the box office. Loved this guys first 2 movies, but what a dirt bag he's turned out to be!

    thrills123

    Jul. 2, 2010 02:02am

  4. I have never been so angry at humanity after exiting a movie as I was after that one. In general I've done a pretty good job avoiding bad movies (neglecting the transformers movies), but this managed to be far worse than anything Michael Bay has done yet. This thing should automatically be enrolled in the Smithy's and put right up on Sci Fi theater, or better yet burned and never shown to the world again. The ONLY thing they did right was settings. The settings were well done. Everything else was a disaster.

    gum0nshoe

    Jul. 2, 2010 09:26am

  5. I am a huge fan of the series and this movie was HORRIBLE.
    1. The names of the characters were not even pronounced correctly. Aang was "AHNG" and Soka was not pronounced "Sock-A" it was "Soak-A." And Unlce Ihro was "Ehrow" not "I-row"
    2. Katara was weak and not the master bender she is.
    3. Why was the entire Fire Nation SouthAsian? Zuko is supposed to be 100% Chinese or Japenese.
    4. Azula is supposed to be this evil, extremely beautiful NOT SOUthAsian girl, that was not the case.
    5. Monk Kiatszo was supposed to have a moustche and BE ASIAN!!
    6. The earth benders were in a prison on a fire nation ship, not on land and Aang never gave a speech, it was only Katara.
    7. What about Aang becoming the moon spirit on the Northern Water Tribe?
    8. No where did it say Princess Yuhway was getting married.
    9. Fake attempt to give Zuko a Scare, and what was with all those meetings with Admiral Zaho and the Firelord?
    10. Uncle Ihro should have been fatter and ASIAN.
    11. I don't get why the whole fire nation is SouthAsian. There is no "race-bending/" Just be true to the show, which he wasn't.

    What was the point of recasting the Nations, this was a big mistake. I don't think M. Knight should do the rest of the movies. As a fan, this was a disgrace to Avatar. Its as bad a making Princess Lea Chinese with an accent, or Spok of the Enterprise as African American. That is not who they were portrayed as.

    Just be true to the show, which he wasn't. There are plenty of movies in this world that are based on an entire race or culture, nothing wrong with it. and everything around them is in an Chinese or Japanese Language. The CULTURE is the pinnacle point of that show. This was a disgrace. I 100% disliked this movie, and I love the show.

    mariam27

    Jul. 2, 2010 10:07am

  6. to mariam27, as much as I believe Shyamalan has bungled the Last Airbender, you have made many mistakes in your listed criticisms.
    1.) It was explained early on why the names were pronounced differently, believing that an American pronunciation for these worldly names was not the direction to go. I'm with you though on how it shouldn't have been changed.
    2.) Katara was not a master waterbender in the first book, nor in any of the books for that matter since it takes years to master the art, but especially so in the first one.
    3.) Zuko and the Firenation are fashioned predominately after Japanese culture and style, but every nation had multiple cultural facets and styles, mostly Chinese and Indian.
    4.) No idea how she was portrayed, but it's just your opinion. I've seen the girl they cast and assumed she'd have a wider role in the sequel. At least she looks the part on two levels. One she actually does look like Azula and two, she could pass for Patel's sister in real life.
    5.) it's Monk "Gyatso"
    6.) yes, it happened that way in the show, you were paying attention.
    7.) Aang was temporarily controlled by the ocean spirit, not the moon spirit. Moon spirit was killed by Zhao remember?
    8.) Princess "Yue" and it was an irrelevant plot point even in the show just to complicate Sokka's relationship to her. If she had not died, I'd imagine tat she wou have dumped whatshisname and went for Sokka, but she died, so it's all irrelevant.
    9.) I think you meant scar, and they did meet with "Zhao" on several occasions in the series, be it principal characters, firenation soldiers and officers, and indirectly with the firelord.
    10.) Well he isn't now, deal with it. Besides, I heard he was the best actor in the movie.
    11.) Just say Indian, saying South Asia covers alot of territories.
    Lord help up me if my favorite animated show is followed by so many quasi/ignoramus-fans like you; who, ironically, misspell names of characters from the show while complaining about their new pronunciations.

    gregtestagent

    Jul. 2, 2010 19:09pm

  7. Actually Gregtestagent Zuko and the Fire nation is predominately fashioned after Chinese culture. The Fire nation is very similar to the Chinese Qin /Han dynasty Empire from fashion, court clothing, and political environment. Their campaign against the Earth/Air/Water nations in the show is very similar to the Chinese warring states period in which Qin came out victorious and started the era of Imperial China. Qin was a smaller state territorily, but technologically advanced, aggressive, and very disciplined in warfare. The firelord, fire soldiers, and common folk in the firenation are dressed in Qin/Han dynasty attire and fashions. Their style is definately not Japanese.

    ajax4

    Jul. 10, 2010 01:54am

  8. This movie, by far, is the worst I have ever seen. I have so many negative reviews about it but didn't take the popular advice of "don't watch it" because of my "benefit of the doubt" attitude. Yes Shyamalan, I agree with you, it is the most diverse movie so far. The most upsetting part is the races were so mixed up. In the series, Katara and Sokka were not white, they even look darker than Aang.
    I HATE how firebending was done in the movie. Changing and taking out a few chunks from the story is one thing, but changing how firebending is done is a whole different story. It's as bad as changing the size of Zuko's scar! It's like changing his whole identity, it symbolizes his past, why he became the person he is. In the show, firebenders didn't carry around torches, set it down, and move chunks of fire from the torch! Ridiculous!
    The only thing that was good about the movie were the settings and the special effects, it was very well done and really beautiful. Other than that, everything was just an embarrassment and an insult to the TV show.

    katnemo7

    Jul. 15, 2010 18:54pm

  9. reasons why Greg is an idiot?

    1) It was originally an american show written by an american so why would they have a problem with the pronunciation

    2)Why did Aang call her Katara seifu she mastered not only healing and blood bending but her skills put all other water benders to shame Katara isn't just a master she's the best

    3)The fire nation is modeled after China not Japan you can tell by Zuko's hair and their architecture

    4)Aang wasn't controlled by any spirit he went into the Avatar state he is the "Avatar" the link between the physical world and the spirit world a spirit wouldn't take him over (Duhh!)

    What do directors have against great animation anyway
    they rapped my childhood with Dragonball now they go after one of the few good and original american series

    (P.s) I'm not american and I think their animation is largely crap at first I couldn't believe Avatar wasn't anime it is brilliant in all aspects. What does Shyamalan know about Avatar anyway I bet he never even watched one episode?

    I hope he doesn't make any more because my favourite character hasn't appeared yet and hopefully will never be soiled by another money hungry directors attempt to make money of other people's ideas.

    mrbangtastic

    Jul. 22, 2010 17:11pm

  10. Woah, too many in here with lists of "What was wrong with this film and what others stated comments".

    In the next fifty years we will all be regurgitating all these fantasy stories with remakes yet again, so why so fast to dismiss what you experience right now? Your great-grandkids will be arguing this same story to you many years from now with remakes of "Astroboy", "Dragonball", "TNMT", and "Airbender". On holgraphic screens probably too. Sigh. Relax people.

    PS: Ever notice those that love something never say anything about it to people they don't know while those that hate always have something to say to anyone listening?

    scarshi

    Jul. 24, 2010 01:23am

  11. I think it's funny the people complaining they don't like the look of the caucasian actors, also complain they don't like the sound of the asian pronunciation of the names. It's also funny they don't seem to realize it's an American show, and that Shamaylan has watched the show, and that's why he wanted to make it. I'm not saying it's a great film - just pointing out the critics' ignorance.

    goocko

    Jul. 27, 2010 16:00pm

  12. I always wonder if the Last Air Bender team has ever consulted any Chinese people in regards to the setting of the movie. I know how to read Chinese characters but there are cases when I couldn't even figure out what the word actually represents.
    The Chinese writings in the movie are like graphics to me--somebody attempting to copy the writings in a graphic or drawing form. I do understand that the Chinese writings are unique since it actually originated from drawings in its actual form and eventually blended and evolved into more complicated writings. I am really confused whether the events actually happen before or after that time period when the writings are firmly set as part of its culture. I think the writings should have firm strokes as you would see in most Chinese movies.
    The racial origins of the characters are so mixed up so I tried my best not to look at them through their own skins.
    I still like the actual animation features more than anything which basically funny and more entertaining.

    buzz2000mille

    Aug. 1, 2010 10:13am

  13. I don't care how superb the graphics and action sequences were -- with elemental havoc, martial arts and incredible technology available in the moviemaking business, Shyamalan had no excuse NOT to deliver.

    Where the movies fails is in everything else: dialogue, character development, audience engagement and just plain FUN. He sucked all the fun out of a series that was fun to watch. I did not give a hoot about any of what was going on. It felt like the film was plodding on half-assedly to deliver plot, plot, plot. What do I care about the plot for, if I don't care about any of the characters, or the outcome of events? Iroh was supposed to be a sage, mischievous, pot-bellied old man with hidden and surprising depths-- not some grizzled macho veteran with pecs. The script was excruciating, and it all felt like Shyamalan sleepwalked through the process relying on his tech team.

    Is this even the same guy who made Sixth Sense and Unbreakable? Even The Village was a decent movie. Why this steep hurtle into neck-high crap?

    gaylegoh

    Aug. 4, 2010 22:40pm

  14. P.S. I was in the cinema the other week and a trailer of Devil appeared on the screens. It was a promising trailer and the audience seemed quietly interested. Then "From the mind of M Night Shyamalan" flashed on screen... and a ripple of laughter erupted into the packed theatre guffawing.

    That should say something about how much work this man has in front of him to salvage his tattered reputation... if Hollywood even gives him the chance.

    gaylegoh

    Aug. 4, 2010 22:43pm

  15. ACTUALLY, mrbangtastic, Aang was controlled by the Ocean spirit. That's why he turned into the creature and destroyed the Fire Nation ships. It is ,after all, another purpose of an Avatar, he can also be a medium for spirits (an example of that would be Avatar Kyoshi in the episode "Avatar Day"). And the Avatar State is the combination of Aang's of the previous Avatars, his past lives.

    katnemo7

    Aug. 5, 2010 02:26am

  16. To the person who wrote that Shyamalan was "true to the story", your statement is at best mistaken and at worst an intentionally misleading ploy apparently meant to steer the unwary towards this steaming pile of cinematic crap. As already well-stated by Mariam27 and others here, Shyamalan's Avatar is a tragically flawed film in which he shows absolutely no respect whatsoever for the original material. To say that this movie is terrible would be putting it mildly. It would be more accurate to say that Shyamalan's Avatar is an abomination which clearly demonstrates the director's laziness, conceit, and total lack of regard for the source material. In short, it sucks, and fans of the epic Avatar TV series would be well advised to avoid this horrible adaptation.

    On a lesser note, to the person who claimed that Kitara never became a master water-bender, I believe that she did, in fact, gain mastery along with the title of "master" after training with a water master in the second book.

    michaelkottler

    Aug. 8, 2010 22:19pm